Loading...
Tech Trend

Request to Pay: What does it mean for instant payments?

The introduction of Request to Pay (R2P) services this year is poised to play a starring role in the broader transformation of the UK and EU’s payments landscape.

Reduction of costs, fraud and chargebacks alongside the delivery of better transaction data are the obvious improvements, yet, it is the potential that R2P holds to act as a catalyst for instant payments which is increasingly stealing the limelight.

What is effectively the next upgrade in digital payments, R2P schemes involve a request for payment sent by the payee which can be approved by the payor, creating a streamlined and faster billing system for both parties.

In a 2019 report published by EBA Clearing, the organisation describes R2P as a key step towards unlocking the enormous potential that instant payments hold for both consumers and businesses.

“Many payments professionals consider Request to Pay to be the missing link between the instant payment clearing & settlement infrastructure and innovative customer solutions.”

In contrast with Direct Debits, R2Ps are real-time, suitable for single or ad hoc payments and they do not require an upfront mandate from the payer. They may also be thought of as an upgrade of Electronic Bill Presentment & Payment (EBPP), allowing the payer to approve and execute the requested payment in real time. EBPP is a common process used by companies to collect payments electronically over the internet, direct-dial access or ATMs.

Will R2P boost appetite for instant payments?

In conversation with Finextra Research, Ireti Samuel-Ogbu, EMEA head of payments and receivables, treasury and trade solutions at Citi, delved into the R2P journey to explore the scheme’s expected impact across the European financial sector.

Samuel-Ogbu anticipates that R2P will create a reciprocal interchange within the UK and European payments landscape, where the access to an instant pay system lends itself to implementing R2P.

“I think it creates a virtuous circle, because when you are sending and receiving instant payments as a bank. You can make more payments because you’re using a smaller amount of liquidity. If the traffic is only one way and all you’re doing is paying, then you’re required to provide a lot more liquidity.”

By introducing receipts into the equation, the velocity and the size of payments can be increased against a smaller amount of liquidity. This reduces risk which reduces cost and the entire ecosystem is set to benefit: “I do think that one of the benefits of Request to Pay will include providing payment optionality for customers; it will also compliment instant payments from a liquidity utilisation perspective and accelerate incomings for banks, in comparison to longer settlement times for card.”

The process is a natural next step as payment providers attempt to streamline and tighten security around digital transfers to meet an increasingly demanding customer base. In a Pay.UK and Ipsos MORI report published September 2019, the raft of benefits R2P could provide listed by respondents centred around two key areas:

  1. Saving time and money by streamlining systems and processes (£1.3 billion saved per annum in billing costs alone). This could involve joining together different systems, reducing manual workloads, enabling better reconciliation and enhancing existing systems.
  2. Improving communication with customers. This could enhance the customer experience by turning transactional payments into a conversation, allowing businesses to support customers better.

Speaking of EBA Clearing’s R2P solution, Erwin Kulk, head of service development and management tells Finextra Researchabout their pan-European infrastructure: “PSPs [payment service providers] and payment operators across Europe have put in a lot of effort to create both critical mass and pan-European reach for instant payments, and Request to Pay will be a crucial tool to leverage these rails for innovative and sustainable end-user solutions.”

“There are two aspects to Request to Pay: first it’s the ability to share data. The second aspect is the ability to make a payment from a bank account. Regardless of whether it’s a finTech third party provider or it’s a bank that is providing that service, I think the whole ecosystem will benefit because you’re providing optionality to consumers.”

Will the EU and UK align or diverge their R2P plans?

While the EU and UK markets have R2P solutions scheduled to go live during 2020, Samuel-Ogbu argues that their respective use cases hold fundamental differences. A Pay.UK report describes R2P as a communication tool which can be overlaid on top of existing payments infrastructure, allowing for a private ‘conversation’ between the biller and the payer. In this way, the delivery and nature of the product itself will to a degree be affected by the payments infrastructure already in place.

“We understand that the UK is carrying out a closed pilot to test R2P with a launch date set for this year. I think it’s fair to say that the way the UK is looking at R2P differs from how the EBA is looking at it, because this seems to be more of a bill presentment type of Request to Pay, rather than an e-commerce use case.” She adds that this isn’t altogether surprising given Open Banking in the UK is one of the most successful Open Banking regimes, which can be used in an e-commerce scenario.

In 2018 EBA Clearing established a taskforce to deliver a pan-European R2P solution (in line with the European Payments Council scheme) with experts and financial institutions working to meet EBA requirements.

In its 2019 report, EBA Clearing highlighted different roll-out approaches and the lack of historical data of processing patterns as hurdles characterising Europe’s journey toward R2P integration.

On this divergence of approach Samuel-Ogbu notes that structurally, there are two different models under which R2P schemes are launched: “One is the Open Banking model which the UK and Europe is looking at. The second is leveraging standardisation with a financial market infrastructure, which is what we are seeing in India with UPI, Australia and more recently with EBA’s RTP.

When a scheme such as R2P is introduced into a financial market infrastructure, as the connectivity to many end users, banks, and even non-banks, the adoption is greater in this standardised environment, Samuel-Ogbu argues.

 

Read more:Request to Pay: What does it mean for instant payments?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *